Image default
Τοις Μετρητοίς

MOODY’S:Coronavirus will hurt spending in China, with spillover to global companies

On 29 January, the World Health Organization said that China’s coronavirus has infected nearly 6,000 people domestically so far, with an additional 68 confirmed cases in 15 other countries. The primary impact is on human health. However, the risk of contagion is

affecting economic activity and financial markets. The immediate and most significant economic impact is in China (A1 stable) but will reverberate globally, given the importance of China in global growth as well as in global company revenue. By sector, the coronavirus will likely have the largest negative impact on goods and services sectors within and outside of China that rely on Chinese consumers and intermediary products.

China’s annual GDP growth forecast unchanged so far, but composition could shift

In our baseline, we expect the outbreak to have a temporary impact on China’s economy and for annual GDP growth in China to remain in line with our forecast of 5.8% in 2020. However, the composition of growth will likely shift because of a dampening of consumption in the first quarter, potentially offset by stimulus measures. Nonetheless, there is still a high level of uncertainty around the length and intensity of the outbreak, and we will review our forecasts as conditions evolve.

Following the outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in 2003, growth and financial markets in China weakened significantly, but for only a short period. An offsetting rebound limited the overall negative effects on annual growth. But the SARS episode is not a perfect comparison, since the composition of the Chinese economy has changed appreciably since 2003, as the exhibit below shows.

The virus will likely have an effect on the revenue of China’s discretionary travel, transportation, lodging, restaurants, retail and services sectors. However, the impact on offline retail sales could be smaller compared with the weakness following the SARS outbreak because of the rapid shift to online sales in China over the past decade. Non-discretionary consumer demand related to the healthcare sector and medical equipment will likely surge.

Chinese authorities have been proactive in taking quarantine measures to contain the infection, including closing public transportation in some cities and conducting screening in major transportation centers. These measures help contain the spread of infection and promote early treatment, although they add costs and constrain economic activity.

Among the challenges of containing the coronavirus include that it can be contagious during the incubation period, and many of those infected or potentially infected traveled ahead of the Lunar New Year. The next few weeks will be vital for determining the extent of infection and the effectiveness of the quarantine measures.

Loss of productivity will likely weigh on domestic supply as a result of sickness, furloughs, and potential delays in manufacturing production given the government’s decision to extend the Lunar New Year holiday. This situation will likely also reduce private investment, but this effect will be secondary to the effect on consumer spending, and will also depend on the macroeconomic policy response.

Hubei province will bear the brunt of economic impact

The outbreak began in Wuhan, the capital of Hubei province and the key transportation and industrial hub in central China. The economic effects on the local area will be significant. Hubei province had expected to record a regional economic growth rate of up to 7.8% in 2020 according to the local authorities, 200 basis points higher than our forecast for China’s total economy. As China’s

ninth-most populous and seventh-highest province by GDP, a slowdown in economic activity will pose significant repercussions for the country as a whole.

Hubei’s role in linking China’s eastern coastal area with the central and western regions will extend the ripple effect on neighboring cities and provinces with a higher reliance on service sectors and with higher population densities.

China’s size and interconnectedness amplifies global impact

The fear of contagion risk is already evident in global financial markets. In addition, the negative spillover will also affect countries, sectors and companies that either derive revenue from or produce in China. China has an even higher share in world growth and is even more closely connected with the rest of the world than during the SARS episode. If the outbreak spreads significantly outside China, the burden on healthcare sectors in other affected countries will potentially increase. The revenue of companies and sectors that rely on Chinese demand will be affected as that demand dampens.

The outbreak will also potentially have a disruptive effect on global supply chains. Global companies operating in the affected area may face output losses as a result of the evacuation of workers. Companies operating outside China that have a strong dependence on the upstream output produced from the affected area will also be under pressure because of possible supply chain disruptions resulting from temporary production delays.

Other Asian-Pacific economies are vulnerable to a decline in tourism from China

The outbreak will take a toll on tourism sectors elsewhere in the region, and places outside the region that receive tourists from China. The initial outbreak occurred a few weeks before the Lunar New Year, which has increasingly become a popular time to travel. China has imposed travel bans on outbound group tours to contain the spread of the virus. The fear of contagion could dampen consumer demand and affect tourism, travel, trade, and services in Hong Kong (Aa3 stable), Macao (Aa3 stable), Thailand (Baa1 positive), Japan (A1 stable), Vietnam (Ba3 negative) and Singapore (Aaa stable), which have been the top destinations of Chinese tourists in recent years.

China’s National Immigration Administration recorded outbound travel grew about 12% year-on-year to 6.3 million trips during the 2019 Lunar New Year. Following the SARS outbreak, tourism fell sharply in most of these economies, particularly in Singapore and Hong Kong, which were also subject to a relatively high number of infections. We expect the risk of potential negative spillovers to domestic tourism in neighboring countries to be higher than during SARS because Chinese nationals now make up the largest share of visitors to other Asia-Pacific economies. The timing is particularly bad for Japan as it seeks to rebound from the dip in consumption, and presumably real GDP growth, in the last quarter of 2019 following a sales tax hike.

Σχετικα αρθρα

ΟΠΑΠ-ΕΕΕ-ΤΕΝΕΡΓ

admin

G.Sachs on Alpha bank

admin

MIG

admin

Τι δείχνει τώρα η μετοχή της MLS

admin

ΧΑ-Ρευστοποιήσεις

admin

Alpha Bank

admin

UBS- Greece: scaling the (macro) upside

admin

XA

admin

Τράπεζες – Σεπτέμβριος

admin

ALPHA BANK

admin

ΛΑΜΔΑ

admin

Τι ψάχνουν οι τραπεζίτες στο Μαξίμου

admin

900

admin

Aegean Airlines

admin

Συνεχίζεται η «μάχη»

admin

Alpha Bank

admin

ΧΑ-ΓΔ

admin

ΟΠΑΠ

admin